<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
	<rss
	 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	 version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>The Heritage Foundation Papers: Regulation</title>
		<link>http://www.heritage.org/research/</link>
		<description>The Heritage Foundation Papers: Regulation</description>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:10:19 EST</lastBuildDate>
		
		<language>en-us</language>
		<generator>heritage.org</generator>
		<copyright>Copyright 2009 The Heritage Foundation</copyright>				


	<item>
		<title>Why Government Control of Bank Salaries Will Hurt, Not Help, the Economy</title>
		<description>In response to the recent financial crisis, the Obama Administration and the Federal Reserve Board are capping executive salaries and bonuses, and imposing a host of new regulations and mandates--all in the name of reducing risk. If the rule of unintended consequences applies anywhere, it applies here. Government pay rules have been tried before--and have consistently increased the very salaries and special bonuses they intended to curb. Besides, a sense of risk--instead of the certainty of taxpayer bail-outs--is precisely what would rein in some of the reckless corporate practices rightly decried by the government and American citizens.</description>
		<link>http://www.heritage.org/Research/Regulation/bg2336.cfm</link>
		<dc:creator>The Heritage Foundation - David M. Mason</dc:creator> 
		<category>Regulation</category>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 15:41:24 EST</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.heritage.org/Research/Regulation/bg2336.cfm</guid>		
	</item>


	<item>
		<title>The Consumer Financial Protection Agency Act: Attempting to Improve Bad Policy</title>
		<description>Despite honest attempts to improve the Consumer Financial Protection Agency Act of 2009, the overall concept is still badly flawed.</description>
		<link>http://www.heritage.org/Research/Economy/wm2650.cfm</link>
		<dc:creator>The Heritage Foundation - David C. John</dc:creator> 
		<category>Regulation</category>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:09:49 EST</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.heritage.org/Research/Economy/wm2650.cfm</guid>		
	</item>


	<item>
		<title>Examining the History and Legality of Executive Branch Czars</title>
		<description>The rise of government by bureaucrats--due to the delegation of power from Congress to administrative agencies, combined with the removal of those agencies from the President&apos;s control--has given rise to efforts by Presidents from both parties to get the bureaucratic state under control through various mechanisms. The rise of &amp;quot;czars&amp;quot; in the current administration is just another manifestation--albeit, an unfortunate one--of this phenomenon.</description>
		<link>http://www.heritage.org/Research/Thought/tst100809a.cfm</link>
		<dc:creator>The Heritage Foundation - Matthew Spalding, Ph.D.</dc:creator> 
		<category>Regulation</category>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 16:10:10 EST</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.heritage.org/Research/Thought/tst100809a.cfm</guid>		
	</item>


	<item>
		<title>Another Sarbanes-Oxley: Threatening Small Businesses with the 'Beneficial' Ownership Bill</title>
		<description>The Incorporation Transparency and Law Enforcement Assistance Act (ITLEAA)--currently under consideration in Congress--would subject small businesses to a series of complicated and burdensome reporting requirements. These new requirements are rem&amp;shy;iniscent to those imposed by Sarbanes-Oxley, and would have similarly negative consequences: increased costs and reductions in business activity and job creation. Further&amp;shy;more, the ITLEAA would do little to actually reduce the use of LLC forms for criminal activity--the purported goal of the legislation.</description>
		<link>http://www.heritage.org/Research/LegalIssues/lm0048.cfm</link>
		<dc:creator>The Heritage Foundation - Hans A. von Spakovsky and Andrew M. Grossman</dc:creator> 
		<category>Regulation</category>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 16:15:00 EST</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.heritage.org/Research/LegalIssues/lm0048.cfm</guid>		
	</item>


	<item>
		<title>The Lehman Brothers Collapse: Financial Regulation One Year Later</title>
		<description>One year ago today Lehman Brothers collapsed. President Obama will mark the occasion with an address to Wall Street in which he will likely outline some broad principles for financial regulatory reform. Instead of rushing forward, Congress should enact real reform that focuses on modernizing the regulator framework, privatizing Fannie and Freddie, and using capital requirements to reduce the systemic risk of large financial institutions.</description>
		<link>http://www.heritage.org/Research/Economy/wm2610.cfm</link>
		<dc:creator>The Heritage Foundation - David C. John</dc:creator> 
		<category>Regulation</category>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:52:57 EST</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.heritage.org/Research/Economy/wm2610.cfm</guid>		
	</item>


	<item>
		<title>How to Protect Consumers in the Financial Marketplace: An Alternate Approach</title>
		<description>The Treasury Department has proposed consolidating the existing consumer protection divisions of the various federal financial regulatory agencies into a new and powerful Consumer Financial Protection Agency (CFPA). A far better approach would be to coordinate the consumer activities of existing state and federal financial agencies by creating a coordinating council designed to promote equal standards of consumer protection using agencies&amp;rsquo; existing powers.</description>
		<link>http://www.heritage.org/Research/Regulation/bg2314.cfm</link>
		<dc:creator>The Heritage Foundation - David C. John</dc:creator> 
		<category>Regulation</category>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 09:16:03 EST</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.heritage.org/Research/Regulation/bg2314.cfm</guid>		
	</item>


	<item>
		<title>Cash for Clunkers: Just Spinning Wheels</title>
		<description>Despite its popularity, the cash-for-clunkers program is no success--unless success is defined as spending a lot of money quickly.</description>
		<link>http://www.heritage.org/Research/Regulation/wm2579.cfm</link>
		<dc:creator>The Heritage Foundation - James L. Gattuso and Nicolas D. Loris</dc:creator> 
		<category>Regulation</category>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 16:05:04 EST</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.heritage.org/Research/Regulation/wm2579.cfm</guid>		
	</item>


	<item>
		<title>House Executive Pay Legislation Puts Pay Czar's Boot in the Door</title>
		<description>The Obama Administration appointed a &amp;quot;pay czar&amp;quot; to oversee compensation at firms receiving substantial government backing. Regrettably, the Administration did not stop with government-aided companies but proposed regulating private-sector pay.</description>
		<link>http://www.heritage.org/Research/Regulation/wm2570.cfm</link>
		<dc:creator>The Heritage Foundation - David M. Mason</dc:creator> 
		<category>Regulation</category>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:55:02 EST</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.heritage.org/Research/Regulation/wm2570.cfm</guid>		
	</item>


	<item>
		<title>The PERI Report on Clean Energy: The Wrong Question and a Misleading Result</title>
		<description>The PERI report does not estimate the economic impact of any policy currently being debated, and the job number finding is not the overall impact to the U.S. economy. The report studies the effect of a hypothetical large investment dropped into clean energy industries versus the effect of the same drop into carbon-based energy industries. The methodology used by the authors is deeply flawed.</description>
		<link>http://www.heritage.org/Research/EnergyandEnvironment/bg2303.cfm</link>
		<dc:creator>The Heritage Foundation - Karen A. Campbell, Ph.D.</dc:creator> 
		<category>Regulation</category>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 11:41:50 EST</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.heritage.org/Research/EnergyandEnvironment/bg2303.cfm</guid>		
	</item>


	<item>
		<title>The Unlikely Orchid Smuggler: A Case Study in Overcriminalization</title>
		<description>Today, enormously complex and demanding regulations are regularly paired with draconian criminal penalties for even minor deviations from the rules. Minor violations from time to time are all but inevitable because full compliance would be either impossible or impossibly expensive. Nearly every time, nobody notices or cares, but all it takes is one exception for the hammer of the law to strike.</description>
		<link>http://www.heritage.org/Research/LegalIssues/lm0044.cfm</link>
		<dc:creator>The Heritage Foundation - Andrew M. Grossman</dc:creator> 
		<category>Regulation</category>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 14:37:41 EST</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.heritage.org/Research/LegalIssues/lm0044.cfm</guid>		
	</item>

	</channel>
	</rss>

