<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
	<rss
	 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	 version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>The Heritage Foundation Papers: Defense</title>
		<link>http://www.heritage.org/research/</link>
		<description>The Heritage Foundation Papers: Defense</description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:10:04 EST</lastBuildDate>
		
		<language>en-us</language>
		<generator>heritage.org</generator>
		<copyright>Copyright 2009 The Heritage Foundation</copyright>				


	<item>
		<title>START Follow-On Treaty Could Interfere with Conventional Strike Systems</title>
		<description>Early indications are that the successor to the START treaty will limit U.S. options to field conventionally armed missiles -- something Congress warned the Administration not to do.</description>
		<link>http://www.heritage.org/Research/NationalSecurity/wm2704.cfm</link>
		<dc:creator>The Heritage Foundation - Baker Spring</dc:creator> 
		<category>Defense</category>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:47:12 EST</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.heritage.org/Research/NationalSecurity/wm2704.cfm</guid>		
	</item>


	<item>
		<title>Move to Hastily Retire Legacy Fighter Aircraft Puts Air Sovereignty at Risk</title>
		<description>Congress must ensure that the final version of the FY 2010 defense appropriations bill prevents the Pentagon from retiring Air National Guard legacy fighter aircraft before there is a viable plan to replace them.</description>
		<link>http://www.heritage.org/Research/NationalSecurity/wm2699.cfm</link>
		<dc:creator>The Heritage Foundation - Mackenzie Eaglen</dc:creator> 
		<category>Defense</category>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:38:11 EST</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.heritage.org/Research/NationalSecurity/wm2699.cfm</guid>		
	</item>


	<item>
		<title>Japan's Security Policy: Navigating the Troubled Waters Ahead</title>
		<description>The United States&apos;s relationship with Japan has just become more complicated. The recent election victory of the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) has resulted in more resistance to a truly shared U.S.-Japanese mission. Refusing to provide troops to aid the coalition in Afghanistan, and generally uninterested in actively engaging in overseas security missions, the risk-averse DPJ is pulling back from its responsibilities in the U.S.-Japan alliance, as well as internationally. This leaves the U.S. in the position of responding to an ally who demands an equal role yet resists assuming equal responsibilities.</description>
		<link>http://www.heritage.org/Research/AsiaandthePacific/bg2340.cfm</link>
		<dc:creator>The Heritage Foundation - Bruce Klingner</dc:creator> 
		<category>Defense</category>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:47:51 EST</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.heritage.org/Research/AsiaandthePacific/bg2340.cfm</guid>		
	</item>


	<item>
		<title>Dangerous Trajectories: Obama's Approach to Arms Control Misreads Russian Nuclear Strategy</title>
		<description>Russia still considers the United States its &amp;quot;principal adversary.&amp;quot; Russia also relies on its nuclear weapons to compensate for its inferiority in conventional weapons relative to the U.S., NATO, and China. Russian political and military leaders are still captives of czarist and Soviet geopolitical thinking and military traditions. U.S. policymakers need to understand this background and Russia&apos;s Soviet-style negotiating tactics when negotiating realistic and verifiable arms control agreements with Russia. The Obama Administration&apos;s wishful thinking and unilateral concessions will not prevent a new arms race.</description>
		<link>http://www.heritage.org/Research/RussiaandEurasia/bg2338.cfm</link>
		<dc:creator>The Heritage Foundation - Ariel Cohen Ph.D.</dc:creator> 
		<category>Defense</category>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 12:19:58 EST</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.heritage.org/Research/RussiaandEurasia/bg2338.cfm</guid>		
	</item>


	<item>
		<title>The Pakistan-Britain Terror Connection: Lessons and Warnings for the United States</title>
		<description>The Pakistan-Britain terror connection poses a serious threat to Great Britain and its allies, including the United States. Breaking the personnel, financial, and ideological links will require fighting terrorism on three fronts: Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Britain. In Afghanistan, the U.S., the U.K., and their allies need to continue to fight the Taliban and al-Qaeda. They should also hold Pakistan accountable for its failure to act decisively against terrorism. In Britain, the government needs to enforce the tightened immigration and asylum practices, refuse to cooperate with radical Islamism, and promote citizenship and economic opportunity to help immigrants assimilate into British society.</description>
		<link>http://www.heritage.org/Research/NationalSecurity/bg2337.cfm</link>
		<dc:creator>The Heritage Foundation - Ted R. Bromund Ph.D., and Lisa Curtis</dc:creator> 
		<category>Defense</category>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 10:41:01 EST</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.heritage.org/Research/NationalSecurity/bg2337.cfm</guid>		
	</item>


	<item>
		<title>Executive Summary: The Pakistan-Britain Terror Connection: Lessons and Warnings for the United States</title>
		<description>The Pakistan-Britain terror connection poses a serious threat to Great Britain and its allies, including the United States. Breaking the personnel, financial, and ideological links will require fighting terrorism on three fronts: Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Britain. In Afghanistan, the U.S., the U.K., and their allies need to continue to fight the Taliban and al-Qaeda. They should also hold Pakistan accountable for its failure to act decisively against terrorism. In Britain, the government needs to enforce the tightened immigration and asylum practices, refuse to cooperate with radical Islamism, and promote citizenship and economic opportunity to help immigrants assimilate into British society.</description>
		<link>http://www.heritage.org/Research/NationalSecurity/bg2337es.cfm</link>
		<dc:creator>The Heritage Foundation - Ted R. Bromund Ph.D., and Lisa Curtis</dc:creator> 
		<category>Defense</category>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 12:48:34 EST</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.heritage.org/Research/NationalSecurity/bg2337es.cfm</guid>		
	</item>


	<item>
		<title>Congress Wisely Acts to Bring Greater Independence to Pentagon's Quadrennial Defense Review Process</title>
		<description>Congress has wisely appointed an independent panel to critique the analysis underpinning the Pentagon&apos;s 2010 Quadrennial Defense Review. The panel should pay particular attention to two of the inherent risks described in the review.</description>
		<link>http://www.heritage.org/Research/NationalSecurity/wm2676.cfm</link>
		<dc:creator>The Heritage Foundation - Mackenzie M. Eaglen and Eric Sayers</dc:creator> 
		<category>Defense</category>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 10:09:29 EST</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.heritage.org/Research/NationalSecurity/wm2676.cfm</guid>		
	</item>


	<item>
		<title>Bomb or Surrender: Not America's Only Options Regarding Iran</title>
		<description>Any long-term strategy to counter the possible emergence of a nuclear Iran must include offensive strike options, defensive systems--including ballistic missile defenses--and diplomatic initiatives.</description>
		<link>http://www.heritage.org/Research/Iran/wm2677.cfm</link>
		<dc:creator>The Heritage Foundation - Baker Spring and James Phillips</dc:creator> 
		<category>Defense</category>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:49:38 EST</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.heritage.org/Research/Iran/wm2677.cfm</guid>		
	</item>


	<item>
		<title>Not a Good Start: The Future of Arms Control</title>
		<description>President Obama has made overt efforts to &amp;quot;reset&amp;quot; bilateral relations with Russia, while they continue to call the U.S. its &amp;quot;principal adversary.&amp;quot; Moscow publicly applauds U.S. disarmament and arms control efforts, while they continue a strong and abiding commitment to nuclear weapons.</description>
		<link>http://www.heritage.org/Press/FactSheet/fs0043.cfm</link>
		<dc:creator>The Heritage Foundation - heritage.org</dc:creator> 
		<category>Defense</category>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:19:59 EST</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.heritage.org/Press/FactSheet/fs0043.cfm</guid>		
	</item>


	<item>
		<title>National Security: Not a Good Argument for Global Warming Legislation</title>
		<description>The Clean Energy Jobs and America Power Act (S. 1733) has engendered tremendous controversy. Concerns abound about the legislation&apos;s adverse economic consequences, and there is skepticism of its affects on world climate trends. I will focus my analysis and observations on the national security implications of attempting to address climate change through a framework established by national legislation.</description>
		<link>http://www.heritage.org/Research/EnergyandEnvironment/tst102709a.cfm</link>
		<dc:creator>The Heritage Foundation - James Jay Carafano, Ph. D.</dc:creator> 
		<category>Defense</category>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 10:13:09 EST</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.heritage.org/Research/EnergyandEnvironment/tst102709a.cfm</guid>		
	</item>

	</channel>
	</rss>

