<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
	<rss
	 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	 version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>The Heritage Foundation Papers: Defense</title>
		<link>http://www.heritage.org/research/</link>
		<description>The Heritage Foundation Papers: Defense</description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 00:10:04 EST</lastBuildDate>
		
		<language>en-us</language>
		<generator>heritage.org</generator>
		<copyright>Copyright 2009 The Heritage Foundation</copyright>				


	<item>
		<title>The Pakistan-Britain Terror Connection: Lessons and Warnings for the United States</title>
		<description>The Pakistan-Britain terror connection poses a serious threat to Great Britain and its allies, including the United States. Breaking the personnel, financial, and ideological links will require fighting terrorism on three fronts: Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Britain. In Afghanistan, the U.S., the U.K., and their allies need to continue to fight the Taliban and al-Qaeda. They should also hold Pakistan accountable for its failure to act decisively against terrorism. In Britain, the government needs to enforce the tightened immigration and asylum practices, refuse to cooperate with radical Islamism, and promote citizenship and economic opportunity to help immigrants assimilate into British society.</description>
		<link>http://www.heritage.org/Research/NationalSecurity/bg2337.cfm</link>
		<dc:creator>The Heritage Foundation - Ted R. Bromund Ph.D., and Lisa Curtis</dc:creator> 
		<category>Defense</category>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 10:41:01 EST</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.heritage.org/Research/NationalSecurity/bg2337.cfm</guid>		
	</item>


	<item>
		<title>Executive Summary: The Pakistan-Britain Terror Connection: Lessons and Warnings for the United States</title>
		<description>The Pakistan-Britain terror connection poses a serious threat to Great Britain and its allies, including the United States. Breaking the personnel, financial, and ideological links will require fighting terrorism on three fronts: Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Britain. In Afghanistan, the U.S., the U.K., and their allies need to continue to fight the Taliban and al-Qaeda. They should also hold Pakistan accountable for its failure to act decisively against terrorism. In Britain, the government needs to enforce the tightened immigration and asylum practices, refuse to cooperate with radical Islamism, and promote citizenship and economic opportunity to help immigrants assimilate into British society.</description>
		<link>http://www.heritage.org/Research/NationalSecurity/bg2337es.cfm</link>
		<dc:creator>The Heritage Foundation - Ted R. Bromund Ph.D., and Lisa Curtis</dc:creator> 
		<category>Defense</category>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 12:48:34 EST</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.heritage.org/Research/NationalSecurity/bg2337es.cfm</guid>		
	</item>


	<item>
		<title>Congress Wisely Acts to Bring Greater Independence to Pentagon's Quadrennial Defense Review Process</title>
		<description>Congress has wisely appointed an independent panel to critique the analysis underpinning the Pentagon&apos;s 2010 Quadrennial Defense Review. The panel should pay particular attention to two of the inherent risks described in the review.</description>
		<link>http://www.heritage.org/Research/NationalSecurity/wm2676.cfm</link>
		<dc:creator>The Heritage Foundation - Mackenzie M. Eaglen and Eric Sayers</dc:creator> 
		<category>Defense</category>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 10:09:29 EST</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.heritage.org/Research/NationalSecurity/wm2676.cfm</guid>		
	</item>


	<item>
		<title>Bomb or Surrender: Not America's Only Options Regarding Iran</title>
		<description>Any long-term strategy to counter the possible emergence of a nuclear Iran must include offensive strike options, defensive systems--including ballistic missile defenses--and diplomatic initiatives.</description>
		<link>http://www.heritage.org/Research/Iran/wm2677.cfm</link>
		<dc:creator>The Heritage Foundation - Baker Spring and James Phillips</dc:creator> 
		<category>Defense</category>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:49:38 EST</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.heritage.org/Research/Iran/wm2677.cfm</guid>		
	</item>


	<item>
		<title>Not a Good Start: The Future of Arms Control</title>
		<description>President Obama has made overt efforts to &amp;quot;reset&amp;quot; bilateral relations with Russia, while they continue to call the U.S. its &amp;quot;principal adversary.&amp;quot; Moscow publicly applauds U.S. disarmament and arms control efforts, while they continue a strong and abiding commitment to nuclear weapons.</description>
		<link>http://www.heritage.org/Press/FactSheet/fs0043.cfm</link>
		<dc:creator>The Heritage Foundation - heritage.org</dc:creator> 
		<category>Defense</category>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:19:59 EST</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.heritage.org/Press/FactSheet/fs0043.cfm</guid>		
	</item>


	<item>
		<title>National Security: Not a Good Argument for Global Warming Legislation</title>
		<description>The Clean Energy Jobs and America Power Act (S. 1733) has engendered tremendous controversy. Concerns abound about the legislation&apos;s adverse economic consequences, and there is skepticism of its affects on world climate trends. I will focus my analysis and observations on the national security implications of attempting to address climate change through a framework established by national legislation.</description>
		<link>http://www.heritage.org/Research/EnergyandEnvironment/tst102709a.cfm</link>
		<dc:creator>The Heritage Foundation - James Jay Carafano, Ph. D.</dc:creator> 
		<category>Defense</category>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 10:13:09 EST</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.heritage.org/Research/EnergyandEnvironment/tst102709a.cfm</guid>		
	</item>


	<item>
		<title>Islamist terrorist Plots in Great Britain: Uncovering the Global Network</title>
		<description>Individuals who traveled in Pakistan and received terrorist training there or in Afghanistan are a central part of the challenge of Islamist terrorism in Britain. Because al-Qaeda&apos;s strategy relies partly on using European nationals to carry out attacks against the United States, the rise of Islamist terrorism in Britain and Europe poses a serious danger to the U.S. and its allies in Europe and around the world.</description>
		<link>http://www.heritage.org/Research/Europe/bg2329.cfm</link>
		<dc:creator>The Heritage Foundation - Ted R. Bromund, Ph.D and Morgan L. Roach</dc:creator> 
		<category>Defense</category>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 14:27:03 EST</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.heritage.org/Research/Europe/bg2329.cfm</guid>		
	</item>


	<item>
		<title>State Department Strategy Review Flawed from Start</title>
		<description>If the discussions at the kick-off event are an indicator, the final QDDR product will repeat past policy mistakes.</description>
		<link>http://www.heritage.org/Research/ForeignAid/wm2659.cfm</link>
		<dc:creator>The Heritage Foundation - Helle C. Dale and James M. Roberts</dc:creator> 
		<category>Defense</category>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:11:02 EST</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.heritage.org/Research/ForeignAid/wm2659.cfm</guid>		
	</item>


	<item>
		<title>AFGHANISTAN: A War Worth Winning</title>
		<description>When campaigning for President, Barack Obama understood the necessity of a strategy for success in Afghanistan.  On March 27, 2009, as President, he announced his intention to keep this promise, saying &amp;quot;the safety of the world is at stake.&amp;quot; But now, it appears his focus is shifting and Vice President Biden, who opposed the successful surge in Iraq, is also opposing a surge in Afghanistan.</description>
		<link>http://www.heritage.org/Press/FactSheet/fs0041.cfm</link>
		<dc:creator>The Heritage Foundation - heritage.org</dc:creator> 
		<category>Defense</category>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 14:23:02 EST</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.heritage.org/Press/FactSheet/fs0041.cfm</guid>		
	</item>


	<item>
		<title>2010 Defense Appropriations Bill: Conference Report Should Defer to Senate Bill on Many Programs</title>
		<description>The Senate&apos;s version of the 2010 defense appropriations bill provides the funds necessary to meet the needs of America&amp;rsquo;s military.</description>
		<link>http://www.heritage.org/Research/NationalSecurity/wm2633.cfm</link>
		<dc:creator>The Heritage Foundation - Mackenzie M. Eaglen</dc:creator> 
		<category>Defense</category>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 11:57:09 EST</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.heritage.org/Research/NationalSecurity/wm2633.cfm</guid>		
	</item>

	</channel>
	</rss>

